Although a professional photographer plausibly alleged that he owned a valid copyright in a photo of basketball superstar Michael Jordan, and that sports apparel company Nike copied the photo to create its “Jumpman” logo that Nike uses in advertisements and on merchandise, the photographer failed to plausibly allege that Nike copied enough of the protected expression from his photo to establish unlawful appropriation, the U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco has decided. The photographer could not claim a copyright in Jordan’s pose in the photo—which depicted Jordan in the middle of a ballet leap, holding a basketball and reaching toward a hoop—and he was entitled to protection only for the specific way the pose was expressed. Because there were differences in the selection and arrangement of elements in the parties’ respective images, the Jumpman logo and the Nike photo from which it was derived were not substantially similar to the copyrighted photo. A decision of the federal district court in Portland, Oregon, dismissing the photographer’s infringement claims against Nike, was affirmed (Rentmeester v. Nike, Inc., February 27, 2018, Watford, P.).
Case date: 27 February 2018
Case number: No. 15-35509
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.
_____________________________
To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Copyright Blog, please subscribe here.
Kluwer IP Law
The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?
Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.
