A Pasadena, California, district court ruling that FilmOn X, LLC, was a “cable system” and thus eligible for compulsory licenses under the Copyright Act has been reversed by the U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco. In a ruling in favor of broadcasters such as Fox Television Stations, Inc., the court held that, based on guidance from the Copyright Office, a service that captures copyrighted works broadcast over the air, and then retransmits them to paying subscribers over the Internet without the consent of the copyright holders, is not a “cable system” eligible for a compulsory license. Therefore, streaming television service provider FilmOn X, LLC, was not entitled to a compulsory license under Section 111 of the Copyright Act (Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. AereoKiller, LLC, March 21, 2017, O’Scannlain, D.).

A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law


________________________

To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Copyright Blog, please subscribe here.


Kluwer Arbitration
This page as PDF

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *