CDSM Directive, Digital Single Market, European Union, Legislative process, Liability, Press Publishers ’ Right

(CIPIL, University of Cambridge)/ /Leave a comment

As reported in earlier posts on this blog, in a 2022 study, I examined the national implementations in the 11 Member States that had at that time transposed Article 15 (the press publishers’ right) and Article 17 (the special copyright liability regime for “online content-sharing services providers” (OCSSPs)) of the EU’s Copyright in the Digital…

European Union, Exceptions and Limitations, Legislative process

(CIPIL, University of Cambridge)/ /Leave a comment

In August 2022, the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Research and Innovation published a study on EU copyright and related rights and access to and reuse of scientific publications, including open access. The study analyses the relationship between EU copyright law and access to and reuse of scientific publications, including open access, as well as potential…

CDSM Directive, CJEU, Conference, Digital Single Market, European Union

(CIPIL, University of Cambridge)/ /Leave a comment

In 2019, the EU’s Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive (CDSMD) was adopted. This included the highly controversial Articles 15 and 17 on, respectively, the new press publishers’ right (PPR) and the new copyright liability scheme for OCSSPs (“online content-sharing services providers”). In a report published in September 2022, I undertook research into the…

CDSM Directive, Digital Single Market, European Union, Legislative process, Press Publishers ’ Right

(CIPIL, University of Cambridge)/ /Leave a comment

In 2019, the EU’s Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive (CDSMD) was adopted. This included the highly controversial Articles 15 and 17 on, respectively, the new press publishers’ right (PPR) and the new copyright liability scheme for “online content-sharing services providers” (OCSSPs). In a report published in September 2022, I undertook research into the…

CJEU, European Union, Jurisdiction, Liability

(CIPIL, University of Cambridge)/ /Leave a comment

As readers of this blog will be aware, on 22 June the European Court of Justice (CJEU) handed down its ruling in joined cases C-682/18 (YouTube) and C-683/18 (Cyando) concerning the liability of online platforms for copyright-infringing uploads made by their users. Two specific platforms were at issue: the popular video-sharing platform YouTube and Uploaded,…

Digital Single Market, Enforcement, European Union, Infringement, Legislative process, Liability, Remedies

(CIPIL, University of Cambridge) and (Institute for Information Law (IViR))/ /Leave a comment

1. Introduction In September 2016, the European Commission published its proposal for a new Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, including its controversial draft Article 13. The main driver behind this provision is what has become known as the ‘value gap’, i.e. the alleged mismatch between the value that online sharing platforms extract…

European Union, Legislative process

(CIPIL, University of Cambridge)/ /Leave a comment

Last week, the Legal Affairs (JURI) Committee of the European Parliament voted in favour of Rapporteur MEP Axel Voss’s proposal on Article 13 of the draft Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market. The saga surrounding this infamous text is however far from over. A group of MEPs are currently challenging the JURI version…

Case Law, CJEU, Communication (right of), Enforcement, European Union, Infringement, Liability

(CIPIL, University of Cambridge)/ /Leave a comment

On 14 June 2017, the CJEU handed down its highly anticipated decision in Case C-610/15, Stichting Brein v Ziggo. As was reported on this blog when the Advocate General’s Opinion was released, the case represents the first time that the liability proper (i.e. for damages, as opposed to mere injunctions) of an internet intermediary for…

AG Opinion, Case Law, CJEU, Communication (right of), European Union, Infringement, Liability, Remedies

(CIPIL, University of Cambridge)/ /Leave a comment

On 8 February Advocate General Szpunar handed down his Opinion on Stichting Brein v Ziggo. The case is significant, as it represents the first time that the liability of an internet intermediary for copyright infringement will be considered by the CJEU. To date, all decisions handed down by that court on intermediary liability have instead…

Digital Single Market, European Union, Exceptions and Limitations, Legislative process, Liability

(CIPIL, University of Cambridge)/ /Leave a comment

As has by now been extensively reported, on 14th September the European Commission released its new copyright reform package. Prominent within this is its proposal for a new Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market. The proposal contains an array of controversial offerings, but from the perspective of this intermediary liability blogger, the most…