CJEU

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is an institution of the European Union (EU).  It is responsible, inter alia, for ensuring that EU law is interpreted and applied in a consistent way in all EU countries.  If a national court is in doubt about the interpretation or validity of an EU law, it can ask the Court for clarification.  The same mechanism can be used to determine whether a national law or practice is compatible with EU law.  The CJEU also resolves legal disputes between national governments and EU institutions, and can take action against EU institutions on behalf of individuals, companies or organisations.

AG Opinion, Case Law, CJEU, Communication (right of), European Union, Infringement, Liability, Remedies

(CIPIL, University of Cambridge)/ /Leave a comment

On 8 February Advocate General Szpunar handed down his Opinion on Stichting Brein v Ziggo. The case is significant, as it represents the first time that the liability of an internet intermediary for copyright infringement will be considered by the CJEU. To date, all decisions handed down by that court on intermediary liability have instead…

Case Law, CJEU, Communication (right of), European Union, Infringement, Legislative process, United Kingdom

(Bristows LLP) and (Bristows)/ /Leave a comment

The CJEU has handed down a decision which is likely to land a fatal blow to the online streaming service TVCatchUp in their long running saga with free-to-air broadcasters. Background As we reported back in 2015, this reference to the CJEU by the UK Court of Appeal followed an appeal by the claimant broadcasters against…

Case Law, CJEU, Communication (right of), Digital Single Market, European Union

(University of Cyprus)/ /Leave a comment

The right of communication to the public has proved to be one of the most intriguing concepts of EU copyright law. The CJEU has had to decide on its scope of application in a variety of cases both in the analogue (See the seminal SGAE case C-306/05) and in the digital world (See: Svensson case…

CJEU, Damages, Enforcement, European Union, Remedies

(Clifford Chance)/ /Leave a comment

On 25 January 2017, the CJEU handed down a very interesting judgment in case C-367/15, concluding that Article 13 of Directive EC 2004/48 (better known as “the Enforcement Directive”) does not prevent a national regulation from stating that when an intellectual property right (“IPR”) has been infringed, the IPR owner may claim an amount corresponding…

CJEU, European Union, Infringement, Liability, Remedies, Sweden

(Institute for Information Law (IViR)) and (Cirio Law Firm)/ /Leave a comment

Readers familiar with EU copyright law will recall that national courts of the EU Member States are able to issue injunctions against ISPs (providers of internet access) ordering them to prevent their customers from accessing websites infringing copyright by blocking access to the websites (UPC Telekabel Wien v Constantin Film C-314/12) by reference to Article…

Austria, Case Law, CJEU, Distribution (right of), Infringement, Making available (right of), Reproduction (right of)

(Geistwert)/ /Leave a comment

Placing a copyright-infringing armchair in a hotel lobby does not qualify as “distribution”, but displaying a photo of it on the hotel’s website does qualify as “making available” under copyright law.  This is the outcome of a recent Austrian Supreme Court judgment, notable for its reversal of the decision of that same court in the…

AG Opinion, Case Law, CJEU, Communication (right of), European Union

(Institute for Information Law (IViR))/ /Leave a comment

On December 8th 2016, Advocate General (AG) Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered his opinion in Case C‑527/15- Stichting Brein v Jack Frederik Wullems, acting under the name of Filmspeler (Filmspeler). This opinion may pave the way for a broader interpretation of the concept of ´communication to the public´ under Article 3 (1) of the InfoSoc Directive. By…

Case Law, CJEU, Database right, Netherlands, Subject matter (copyrightable)

(Institute for Information Law (IViR))/ /Leave a comment

On 22 November 2016, the Court of Appeal of Amsterdam decided the case Pearson v. Bär Software (the judgment is only available in Dutch). The judgment seems remarkable in light of the CJEU’s earlier ruling in the Ryanair case. How do they compare? The Pearson case The Pearson v. Bär Software case considered a collection…

Case Law, CJEU, Exceptions and Limitations, Infringement, Serbia

(Institute for Information Law (IViR))/ /Leave a comment

In the past few months, the press exception has been at the centre of attention in court proceedings in Serbia. The Appeal Court has concluded that a photograph, protected by copyright, taken a few minutes after a car accident where seven people were injured was an integral part of the current event about which the…

Case Law, CJEU, Communication (right of), European Union, Germany, Infringement, Netherlands

(Institute for Information Law (IViR))/ /Leave a comment

Lower courts can give fresh insight into the adjudication taking place at the highest national and European courts. This is especially true for the recent GS Media case. The German and Dutch courts have created new food for thought on the meaning of placing a hyperlink ‘for profit’. The exact meaning of this notion is…