Jurisdiction

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Authorship, European Union, Fair Use, Originality, Text and Data Mining (TDM), United Kingdom, USA

(Potter Clarkson LLP and King's College London)/ /Leave a comment

Copyright protection in machine-generated works is not a new issue for law makers. The traditional concept of human authorship was first challenged with the emergence of photography and this has continued every time a new technology comes about. In the U.S., the case of Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, 111 U.S. 53 (1884) extended copyright…

Artificial Intelligence (AI), European Union, Legislative process, Text and Data Mining (TDM)

(Institute for Information Law (IViR))/ /Leave a comment

Machine readable opt-outs from TDM As we head into the last month of the current EU legislative term, there are increasing signs that EU lawmakers are unable to agree on the AI Act, which was supposed to be one of the crowning digital policy achievements of Ursula von der Leyen’s Commission. Recent media reports suggest…

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Authorship, CJEU, European Union, Originality, United Kingdom

(Georgetown University Law Center)/ /2 Comments

Recently, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, in line with several decisions of the U.S. Copyright Office’s Review Board, found that human creativity is the sine qua non of copyrightability, refusing to register a work lacking human creative involvement or control. In this way, the U.S. jurisprudence embraces the distinction between…

Case Law, Copyright, Originality, Subject matter (copyrightable), United Kingdom

, (Bristows LLP)/ /Leave a comment

The UK High Court has held that Lidl’s rights in the Lidl logo were infringed by Tesco’s Clubcard Price(s) signs ([2023] EWHC 873 (Ch)). Specifically, the court made the following findings. Trade mark infringement – Lidl’s trade mark for the Lidl logo was infringed by Tesco’s Clubcard Price(s) signs, which took unfair advantage of Lidl’s…

Case Law, USA

(Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory)/ /Leave a comment

The posting of the privately-developed standards constitutes fair use—at least when done for non-profit purposes. A public interest organization that made available to the public a collection of technical standards incorporated by reference in federal regulations engaged in a fair use of those standards and therefore did not infringe on the exclusive rights of the…

Artificial Intelligence (AI), European Union, Infringement, Legislative process, USA

, (Luiss Guido Carli University)/ /Leave a comment

Part 1 of this post introduced the challenges for copyright associated with generative IP and the legislative developments in this field. This part 2 explores the idea of introducing a statutory license for machine learning purposes for generative AI as a compromise solution to secure a vibrant environment for AI development while preserving the central…

Artificial Intelligence (AI), European Union, Infringement, Legislative process, Text and Data Mining (TDM), USA

, (Luiss Guido Carli University)/ /1 Comment

Introduction Generative AI is disrupting the creative process(es) of intellectual works on an unparalleled scale. More and more AI systems offer services that push users’ production capacity for new literary and artistic works beyond unforeseen barriers. Algorithmic tools are gradually colonizing every creative sector, from being able to generate text (i.e., ChatGPT, Smodin), to perform…

European Union, Exceptions and Limitations, Exhaustion, Infringement

(University of Kent)/ /Leave a comment

Free spaces in copyright law are fundamental. They allow us to use and enjoy copyright works, ultimately supporting the creation of future works. Yet, since the Information Society Directive, European copyright law has preferred to protect and incentivise online business models over creativity. This post reflects on the role of exploiters, namely copyright holders with…

European Union, Exceptions and Limitations, Infringement, Legislative process

(University of Liverpool)/ /Leave a comment

As succinctly noted by Susan Bischoff in a prior post, the ongoing legal saga surrounding the ‘Metall auf Metall’ case continues to yield legal insights. Presently, a new reference from the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) asks the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for vital interpretive guidance concerning the parody exception…

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Case Law, Infringement, Legislative process, USA

(University of Milan)/ /Leave a comment

The US class action against Google Bard (J.L. v. Alphabet Inc, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:23-cv-03440) In a recent post we analysed a class action filed in the US against Open AI for unauthorized use of copyright works for training of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT (here) (“Generative…