…own intellectual creation? Do students expose themselves to liability for copyright infringement when using GenAI output? This blog post – based on our journal article published in the European Intellectual…
…interpretation of Article 2(7) of the Berne Convention – an exception to Berne’s ground rule of national treatment. According to Article 2(7) the designer of a work of applied art…
…Court (‘Conseil d’Etat’), that can be summed up as follows: must Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58 on privacy and electronic communications be interpreted as precluding national legislation which authorises the…
…study prompted a re-examination of the wording of the Dutch implementation of Article 17 CDSMD comparative to other jurisdictions. This revealed an implementation slip: Article 17(2) CDSMD states that authorisations…
…51 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (“CDPA”). Section 51 CPDA provides a defence to copyright infringement, which applies where a defendant makes an article to a design…
…appropriate safeguarding mechanisms. This is an issue we explored recently in a co-authored an article for the EIPR’s AI Special Issue (also available as a CREATe Working Paper): Evidencing the…
…made available open access. Publishers have reacted by adjusting their copyright policies in such a way that open access can only be achieved by paying extra (an article processing charge…
…suggests that YouTube’s disclosed figures may under represent the actual extent of copyright moderation. Our study focused on the effects of Article 17 of the EU Copyright in the Digital…
…and simple. Essentially, Member States cannot exclude from the system of fair compensation required by Article 5(2)(b) rightholders that are conferred a reproduction right by Article 2 InfoSoc Directive, on…
…bigstock.com. The first question was whether the reproductions made by LAION fell under the temporary copying exception of Article 5(1) of the InfoSoc Directive (implemented in Germany as § 44a…
