Drake’s use of the lyrics for a 35-second sample of another song was transformative, the amount used was reasonable, and there was no evidence his use negatively affected the sampled song’s market.
Affirming a ruling by the federal district court in New York City, the Second Circuit has determined that rapper Drake was correctly awarded summary judgment on a copyright infringement claim brought by the estate of the late jazz musician Jimmy Smith because Drake’s use of the lyrics for a 35-second sample of one of Smith’s songs was fair use. Under the relevant fair use factors, Drake’s use of the lyrics was transformative, the amount used was reasonable, and there was no evidence his use negatively affected the sampled song’s market. Thus, the decision of the lower court was affirmed (Estate of Smith v. Graham, February 3, 2019, Calabresi, G.).
Case date: 03 February 2020
Case number: No. 19-28
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.
To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Copyright Blog, please subscribe here.
Kluwer IP Law
The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?
Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.