The reproduction of an author’s articles in a newspaper’s online archive was not protected from copyright infringement claims by Section 108(a) of the Copyright Act because this archive was not a “library” or “archive” within the meaning of this section.
The author of two articles whose copyright infringement claims against a newspaper over the electronic reproduction of his articles in an online archive had been dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 11 had not taken a frivolous legal position without evidentiary support, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled in an unpublished decision reversing and remanding the district court’s dismissal (Vient v. Highlands News-Sun,September 29, 2020, per curiam).
Case date: 29 September 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, No. 19-14924
A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.
To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Copyright Blog, please subscribe here.
Kluwer IP Law
The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?
Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.