Three dissenters would have dismissed the case as improvidently granted because the petitioner appeared to address different issues in its brief from its petition for review.
An inaccuracy in a copyright registration application that results from a mistake—whether of fact or of law; that is, lack of factual or legal knowledge of the inaccuracy on the part of the applicant—will not render the registration invalid, a divided Supreme Court has held in an opinion authored by Justice Breyer. Because Section 411 of the Copyright Act makes registration of a copyright a prerequisite to bringing an infringement suit, works that are the subject of registrations invalidated due to inaccuracies in filings could not be enforced in court. This decision essentially makes it easier for rightsholders to go forward with IP enforcement actions. Justice Thomas, joined by Justices Alito and Gorsuch, dissented, stating that he would have dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted (Unicolors, Inc., Petitioner v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., February 24, 2022, Breyer, S.).
Case date: 24 February 2022
Case number: No. 20-915
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law.
To make sure you do not miss out on regular updates from the Kluwer Copyright Blog, please subscribe here.
Kluwer IP Law
The 2022 Future Ready Lawyer survey showed that 79% of lawyers think that the importance of legal technology will increase for next year. With Kluwer IP Law you can navigate the increasingly global practice of IP law with specialized, local and cross-border information and tools from every preferred location. Are you, as an IP professional, ready for the future?
Learn how Kluwer IP Law can support you.