CDSM Directive, Digital Single Market, European Union, Legislative process, Remuneration (equitable)

(University of Cambridge)/ /Leave a comment

In Part I of this two-part post on Chapter 3 of the new Copyright Directive, I argued that Articles 18-23 were well-intentioned. It is now up to Member States to send clear signals of support to their creative community by not rendering these provisions ineffective. In addition, while there is ample opportunity to harmonise creator-protective…

CDSM Directive, Digital Single Market, European Union, Legislative process, Remuneration (equitable)

(University of Cambridge)/ /Leave a comment

Chapter 3 of Title IV of the Directive encompasses a set of six articles specifically directed at authors and performers (henceforth ‘creators’). For many industry stakeholders, this set of articles goes hand in hand with the controversial article 17 (most recently discussed on the blog here, here and here). In conversation with Crispin Hunt, Chair…

Collective management, European Union, Legislative process, Performers' Rights

(University of Cambridge)/ /Leave a comment

In an article recently published in the JIPITEC (and available here), I examined parts of the ongoing copyright reform process drawing on a case study on the Fair Internet for Performers Campaign. This process has been characterised by strong discourses centred on ‘fairness’. Using discourse analysis, I found the concept of fairness to be mostly…