Remuneration (equitable)

Performers have a right to equitable remuneration for the public performance and broadcast of their recordings.

CDSM Directive, Digital Single Market, European Union, Legislative process, Remuneration (equitable)

(University of Cambridge)/ /Leave a comment

Chapter 3 of Title IV of the Directive encompasses a set of six articles specifically directed at authors and performers (henceforth ‘creators’). For many industry stakeholders, this set of articles goes hand in hand with the controversial article 17 (most recently discussed on the blog here, here and here). In conversation with Crispin Hunt, Chair…

Case Law, Exceptions and Limitations, Liability, Remuneration (equitable), Sweden

(Lindahl)/ /Leave a comment

The Supreme Court clarified the circumstances under which private copying levies should be paid by importers of cell phones, and reached the conclusion that if two technically independent devices have such a close connection that they together make up one device, such device could be subject to the provisions regarding private copying levies. Case date: 29…

Case Law, Collective management, Estonia, Exceptions and Limitations, Remuneration (equitable)

(Palladium Attorneys at Law)/ /Leave a comment

The Tallinn Circuit Court finally and definitively determined the action in the “blank tape levy” court case. This landmark court case had been pending since February 2013, when the authors’, performers’ and phonogram producers’ collecting societies initially filed their complaint against the Government of the Republic of Estonia. During the litigation, the case was reviewed…

Case Law, Performers' Rights, Portugal, Remedies, Remuneration (equitable)

(Coimbra University)/ /Leave a comment

The Supreme Court confirmed that performing artists (performers) have a mandatory right to equitable remuneration from broadcasters or movie producers as consideration for the statutory assignment of most of their rights to broadcasters and producers.  Moreover, the Court declared that in award calculation two methods of fixing the amount of remuneration are possible: either as…

Case Law, CJEU, European Union, Exceptions and Limitations, Legislative process, Private copying, Reimbursement, Remuneration (equitable), Spain

(Elzaburu)/ /Leave a comment

The Spanish Supreme Court has annulled some of the rules regulating the system of financing fair compensation for private copying through the General State Budget on the grounds that they are incompatible with EU law. The system that had been in place up until now was analysed by the CJEU through a number of questions…

Case Law, CJEU, European Union, Exceptions and Limitations, Italy, Private copying, Remuneration (equitable)

(Institute for Information Law (IViR))/ /Leave a comment

Background, Facts, and Questions On 22 September 2016 the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’ or ‘Court’) ruled on Case C-110/15 – Microsoft Mobile Sales International and others. (The case was formerly known as Nokia Italia and Others before Nokia Italia SpA changed its name to Microsoft Mobile Sales International Oy.) This is yet…

Case Law, Estonia, Exceptions and Limitations, Private copying, Remuneration (equitable)

(Palladium Attorneys at Law)/ /Leave a comment

A full report of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. In this landmark case, the Estonian Supreme Court analysed in detail the legal issues relating to equitable remuneration for the private copying exemption, concentrating on the legality of the regulation on the “blank tape levy” which was established in 2006, and had…

Case Law, CJEU, European Union, Exceptions and Limitations, Netherlands, Remuneration (equitable)

(Institute for Information Law (IViR))/ /Leave a comment

Yes, e-lending can land itself a spot under the public lending right. That is what the European Court of Justice held in its preliminary ruling in the case between Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v. Stichting Leenrecht (10 November 2016, case C‑174/15). The decision clarifies the Rental and Lending Rights Directive’s scope of application. It is an…

AG Opinion, Case Law, CJEU, Collective management, European Union, Exceptions and Limitations, France, Remuneration (equitable)

(Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition)/ /Leave a comment

The prior express consent of the author is necessary to use a copyright work under EU law; the statutory presumption of collective management of copyright doesn’t comply with the need for express prior consent, even with an opt-out possibility and for a legitimate objective, Advocate General Wathelet said in his opinion on the pending request…

Case Law, Digital Single Market, Distribution (right of), European Union, Exceptions and Limitations, Remuneration (equitable)

(University of Cyprus)/ /Leave a comment

On June 16, Advocate General (AG) Spuznar delivered his opinion in Case C‑174/15 Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht. The case emerged from a dispute between VOB, the association of Dutch public libraries, and a foundation entrusted with collecting the remuneration for lending which is due to authors.  In VOB’s view, the lending of electronic…